Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
group_4_presentation_2_-_chronic_obstructive_pulmonary_disease_copd [2016/11/02 19:16]
hongjj
group_4_presentation_2_-_chronic_obstructive_pulmonary_disease_copd [2018/01/25 15:18] (current)
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ====== ====== Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ======
  
 +
 +
 +{{:​4._copd-_presentation.pdf|}}
  
 ===== Introduction ===== ===== Introduction =====
-A Genetically Modified Organism is any organism created by gene splicing techniques and often involves merging DNA from different species (31). Scientists directly manipulate an organism’s genome to isolate traits or characteristics deemed of value. Currently, the safety of GMOs is under research as they are relatively recent developments (22). 
  
 **What is COPD** **What is COPD**
  
-Humans have been domesticating and improving plants and animals since 30,000 BCE (25)Initiallyancestors began genetically modifying dogs through selective breeding of traits (25). This is achieved ​by only allowing dogs with desirable characteristics to reproduce until such trait is amplified. +Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasedenoted as COPD is a type of obstructive lung disease ​(n.d., 2013). It is characterized ​by long-term poor airflow and displays symptoms including cough with sputum production and shortness of breathFigure 1 displays ​visual representation of lung tissue of a healthy individual ​and of an individual with COPDFrom the beginning of its diagnosis, these symptoms from individuals with COPD tend to worsen over timeIt is the fourth leading cause of death in the world as of 2013.
-Modern genetic modifications did not begin until 1973 when two scientists, Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen, designed ​method to splice ​gene from one organism ​and insert it into the genome ​of another (25)Bacteria were the initial organisms manipulated ​to have antibiotic resistance, followed by inserting foreign DNA into mice a year later (11)The field continued to grow exponentially with many foreseeable possibilities.+
  
-As GMOs began to be used in industry by farmers and countries they were thought of as the answer to world hunger. GMOs were used to achieve many different results; a more visually attractive organism, one that is easier to cultivate and breed, pest resistance, drought resistance and an increase in nutritional value were all goals of the developing GMO market. Agencies such as the government, natural resources, environmental groups, and the media worried about the effect of GMOs on the environment and the food chain (25). There have also been changes in public opinion as many of the long-term side effects have yet to be determined both from an environmental and biological health perspective. 
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​timeline_of_the_development_of_gmo_s.png|}}</box| Figure 1: A timeline ​of the development ​of GMOs. +<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​normal_and_copd_lung.png}}</​box| Figure 1: Lung tissues ​of a normal individual and of an individual with COPDRetrieved ​fromhttp://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health/health-topics/topics/copd>
-Modifed ​from  http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2015/from-corgis-to-corn-a-brief-look-at-the-long-history-of-gmo-technology/>+
  
  
  
-**Prevalence and Epidemiology of the Disease**+**Epidemiology ​and Economic Burden ​of the Disease**
  
-  +As of 2010, 329 million people, approximately 4.8% of the population are affected by COPD (n.d. 2010). The primary cause of COPD is due to the rise in tobacco use among both men and women. The increase in the developing world since 1970 is believed to influence the increase in smoking within the regionThe global numbers are expected to progressively increase as risk factors remain prevalent and the aging population continues to increase. As expected, COPD is more common in older people; on average, it affects 34-200 out of 1000 people older than 65 years
-Step 1: Identifying the trait of interest. +
-Scientists identify ​the trait they wish to includeFor example, increased resistance ​in an environment ​and look for an organism that is naturally resistant/ has that trait (22)Then they must identify that gene sequence responsible.+
  
-Step 2: Isolate the genetic trait of interest +COPD is also considered one of the most expensive conditions to treat in U.S. hospitals in 2011, averaging ​to approximately $5.7 billionThe global estimated cost of treating COPD is $2.1 trillion; $1.9 trillion goes to direct medical care costs such as patient care and $0.2 trillion goes to indirect medical care costs such as sick pay for medical professionals. Costs are projected ​to more than double by 2030.
-Comparative analysis ​is used to decode what part of the genetic makeup contains the gene (22)Then genomes of the same species with and without the trait are compared ​to identify varying regions containing the gene of interest (5)If no database exists scientists will knock out parts of the genome until the gene of interest is lostSeed chipping is a method where a piece of the seed is shaved off before it is planted so that its DNA can be studiedThen plants are allowed ​to grow and the one with the desired traits ​are traced back to initial DNA harvested (5).+
  
-Step 3: Insert the desired genetic trait into a new genome ​ 
-Gene guns are the most common mechanisms of gene transfer (22). A metal particle coated with DNA is inserted into a plant (22). Enzymes insert DNA of interest into a plasmid, then shuck the plasmid to guarantee replication and incorporation of the gene into the organism'​s genome. 
  
-Step 4: Growing the GMO 
-Must monitor the organism to ensure proper growing conditions with the correctly modified genome. A huge effort is made to keep desired plants alive and reproducing once working to monitor optimal growing conditions for seeds (22). 
- 
- 
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​procedure_to_make_a_gm_plant.jpeg|}}</​box| Figure 2: The procedure to make a GM plant. 
-Modified from: http://​sitn.hms.harvard.edu/​flash/​2015/​how-to-make-a-gmo/>​ 
- 
- 
-**Economic Burden of COPD** 
  
 **Mechanism of Disease** **Mechanism of Disease**
  
-- IMAGE - +COPD is an airway inflammation syndrome which consists of structural changes and mucociliary dysfunction.
  
 +**Structural Changes**
  
-===== Causes ​and Pathophysiology =====+The pulmonary system undergoes structural changes as a direct result of the inflammatory response that is associated with COPD. Eventually, this leads to the narrowing of the airways, making it harder for the individual to breathe. Parenchymal destruction is associated with loss of lung tissue elasticity (Takeda, 2012), implicating that the small airways collapse during exhalation ​and impedes airflow.
  
-**Environmental Factors - Air Pollution** 
  
 +**Mucociliary Dysfunction** ​
  
-Efficiency is determined by the optimal yield of a productconsidering the costs associated with producing this yieldGenetic modification of organisms increases the efficiency of productsrendering beneficial factors ​for both producer and consumerThe use of bovine somatotropin (bST)/ recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH) ​in lactating dairy cows demonstrates such efficiency.+Chronic smoking and COPD inflammation forces mucous glands that line the airway lung walls to enlarge. This in turncauses healthy cells to be replaced by excessive mucus-secreting cellsOver timeCOPD also causes damage to the mucociliary transport system which is primarily responsible ​for clearing the mucus from airwaysFigure 2 shows a visual representation ​of the mechanism ​in how the presence of mucus worsens airflow.
  
-The anterior pituitary gland naturally secretes somatotropin,​ a peptide hormone which stimulates growth, cell regeneration,​ and reproduction in human and animals (3). Bovine somatotropin (bST), otherwise referred to as recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH), is produced through recombinant DNA techniques (3). The direct effects of bSt/ rbGH result in alterations to numerous tissues, metabolic processes involving all nutrient ​classes, and cellular mechanisms such as intracellular signal transduction systems and response to homeostatic signalsIndirect ​effects ​are suspected to be mediated by the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and have been found to impact mammary glandsThe environment and management factors, such as nutritional status, play regulatory roles in such effects and responses (3).+<box width classes ​round white centre|>​{{:​untitled6.png}}</​box| Figure 2: Mechanism of Mucociliary ​effects ​from COPDRetrieved from: https://en.wikipedia.org/​wiki/​Chronic_obstructive_pulmonary_disease>​
  
-Bovine somatotropin (bST)/ recombinant bovine growth hormone (rbGH) is utilized within cows to increase milk production (WHO). Milk response in these cows is greatest during the declining phase of lactation and milk quality is reportedly unaltered (3). 
  
 +===== Causes and Pathophysiology =====
  
 +**Environmental Factors - Air Pollution**
  
-**The Relationship Between ​COPD Deaths ​and Air Pollution**+Biological dust exposure in the workplace is a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Matheson, M.C., et al., performed a cross sectional study of the risk factors of COPD relating to job history of 1200 participants. Those exposed to biological dust had increased risk of chronic bronchitis, emphysema and COPD with incidence being higher in women compared to men even though they reported less exposure to biological dust than men. Biological dust includes microbes such as plant and animal, bacteria, fungi, allergens, endotoxins, peptidoglycans,​ glucans and pollens. Occupations affected by biological dust are those in the cotton industry, farmers, grain handlers, bakers, saw mill workers, nurses, artists, and cleaners. 
 +The duration and type of exposure plays a role in increasing risk of COPD. Gas, fumes, ​and mineral dust do not pose a risk. The only way to reduce risk is to reduce exposure to these in the workplace (Matheson, M., 2005).
  
  
-Advances in molecular and reproductive technology ​have driven ​the practice ​of commercial animal pharming over the past twenty years (14). Pharming ​is a branch of biotechnology which bridges together the contrasting fields of pharmaceuticals ​and farmingTransgenic plants or animals are utilized for producing pharmaceuticals synthesized for human or animal consumption (7). Animal pharming ​is promoted as cost-effective method of biopharmaceutical production (14) and has the potential to become a highly lucrative industry (7)+**Outdoor Air Pollution** 
 +Urban areas have the worst air pollution with some countries having more air 
 +pollution than others. Air pollutants have harmful effects on the airways, they increase oxidative stress, pulmonary and systemic inflammation,​ amplification ​of viral infections and reduction in air ciliary activity ​(Ko, F. & Hui, D., 2012). Higher traffic density ​is proven to be associated with higher pollution ​and lower forced expiratory volume (Ko, F& Hui, D., 2012). Therefore it is biologically possible that air pollutants damage lungs, but it is not determined to be causative factor due to lack of long-term studies.
  
-The need for pharmaceutical intervention is evident amongst patients possessing hereditary antithrombin deficiencies. In 2006, an anticoagulant called Antithrombin became the first recombinant protein to be approved for commercialization by the United States’ Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (18). Antithrombin is extracted and purified from the milk of transgenic dairy goats (16). Transgenic animals, such as these goats, are produced via one of two contemporary methods: intra-pronuclear zygotic DNA microinjection (MI) or somatic cell nuclear transfer (NT). As linear DNA enters the nucleus, it is capable of integrating into the genome of cell lines or living organisms (18).  
  
-The most promising site for production of recombinant proteins is the mammary gland due to the large quantities of protein ​that can be produced ​(16). Since milk is often produced in abundancederiving ​and producing pharmaceuticals ​in this manner is determined to be cost efficient ​(14).+**Indoor Air Pollution** 
 +Indoor air pollutants include tobacco smoke and biological allergens/ exposure are the 
 +major indoor pollutants. A cross sectional study in China and the USA proved ​that tobacco smoke from others is associated with development of COPD (Ko, F. & Hui, D., 2012). Biomass as a fuel source includes burning wood, crop residues, and animals during cooking or heating the home which releases toxins. Toxins are released because these fuels have low combustion efficiency. In rural and developing countries biomass fuel burning happens inside resulting ​in increased amounts of indoor air pollution ​(Ko, F. & Hui, D., 2012). Women are also more affected by indoor and outdoor air pollution (Ko, F. & Hui, D., 2012). 
 +COPD results from the combination of genetic and environmental factors; having more than one risk factor increases odds of getting the disease.
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​producing_transgenic_animals.jpg|}}</​box| Figure 3. Producing Transgenic Animals. Retrieved from Maksimenko, Deykin, Khodarovich & Georgiev (2013)> 
  
 +<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​summary_of_pathways_and_candidate_genes_involved_in_copd.png|}}</​box| Figure 3: Summary of Pathways and Candidate Genes Involved in COPD. Retrieved from:
 +http://​citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/​viewdoc/​download?​doi=10.1.1.629.4676&​rep=rep1&​type=pdf>​
  
  
Line 78: Line 71:
  
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​inflammatory_mechanisms_in_copd._macnee_2006_.png|}}</​box| Figure 4. Inflammatory mechanisms in COPD. Retrieved ​from MacNee (2006)>+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​inflammatory_mechanisms_in_copd._macnee_2006_.png|}}</​box| Figure 4. Inflammatory mechanisms in COPD. Modified ​fromMacNee (2006)>
  
  
Line 90: Line 83:
  
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​a._normal_small_airway_b._abnormal_small_airway_exhibiting_airway_remodeling_in_copd._berge_et_al._2011_.png|}}</​box| Figure 5: A. Normal Small Airway, B. Abnormal Small Airway Exhibiting Airway Remodeling in COPD. Retrieved ​from Berge et al. (2011)>+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​a._normal_small_airway_b._abnormal_small_airway_exhibiting_airway_remodeling_in_copd._berge_et_al._2011_.png|}}</​box| Figure 5: A. Normal Small Airway, B. Abnormal Small Airway Exhibiting Airway Remodeling in COPD. Modified ​fromBerge et al. (2011)>
  
  
 **Biological Perspectives- Genetics** **Biological Perspectives- Genetics**
  
 +Genes might play a significant role in COPD, and might even explain why some people who smoke develop the disease and others do not. There is a genetic component accounting for a small number of COPD cases associated with alpha1-antitrypsin protein deficiency (AATD). Treatment for this involves increasing amounts of AAT protein in the body through intravenous injection of the protein derived from human plasma, therefore halting further damage to lung (Castalsi., P.J., et al., 2010). ​ AATD inhibits proteases and protects tissues from enzymes of inflammatory cells, when it is absent neutrophils can break eastin down resulting in pulmonary complications including COPD (Castalsi., P.J., et al., 2010). Many researchers have performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) which provides an unbiased and complete search of the genome for susceptibility to COPD. Pillai and colleagues studies the association between COPD and the CHRNA3/​CHRNA5/​IREB2 region on chromosome 15 (Pillai, S., et al., 2009). MeMeo and colleagues performed gene expression studies comparing normal to COPD lung tissue resulting in the discovery of IREB2 region on chromosome 15 as a contributing genetic factor (DeMeo, D., et al., 2009). Large population genome studies have also found that SNPs near HHIP can also be associated with COPD (Hancock, D., et al., 2010). Overall, although many things were found the overall conclusions amongst the COPD community and researchers is that there is strong evidence concluding that IREB2, HHIP, and FAM13A loci are association with COPD susceptibility (Hancock, D., et al., 2010).
 +
 +Comparison of monozygotic and dizygotic twins used to assess environmental versus genetic effects (MZ share 100% genes, DZ share 50%) showing heritability ranges from 0.5-0.8 (Hancock, D., et al., 2010). The study discovered genes coding for various proteins can exacerbate COPD. Proteases and antiproteases,​ such as MMP-12, play a role in tissue repair associated with inflammation on chromosomes 11,​14,​16,​20,​22 (Pendas, A., et al, 1996). Presence of MMP-12 polymorphisms increase the risk of developing COPD when smoking; in MMP-12 knockout mice they did not develop emphysema when exposed to cigarette smoke (Hautamaki, R., et al., 1997). It is the Asn357Ser polymorphism associated with decline in lung function (Hautamaki, R., et al., 1997). Xenobiotic Metabolizing Enzymes, such as EPHX, are involved in metabolizing high reactive epoxide intermediates formed from cigarette smoke that cause injury (Joos, L., Pare, P., Sandford, A., 2002). Two polymorphisms in EPHX gene with 2 substitutions at exon 3 and 4 result in slower metabolizing enzymes more commonly found in COPD patients and emphysema patients, (Smith, C & Harrison, D., 1997). Additionally,​ genes coding for inflammatory mediators, antioxidants,​ and mucociliary clearance factors can all have mutations causing these proteins not to work perfectly resulting in increased COPD symptoms (Joos, L., Pare, P., Sandford, A., 2002).
  
  
Line 118: Line 114:
 Across North America, pulmonary rehabilitation has become an extremely popular method for long-term management of COPD (Goldstein et al., 1994). It aims to manage and improve some of the disabilities that are associated with COPD, such as decreased motor function and weight loss (Goldstein et al., 1994). There are three facets of pulmonary rehabilitation are: the multidisciplinary nature of, individualized programs and attention to physical and social function (Ries & Squier, 1996). The collaboration between various kinds health care professionals makes pulmonary rehabilitation very successful because it encompasses a variety of health care fields. Individuals involved include: physicians, nurses, occupational therapists, psychologists,​ nutritionists and exercise specialists. (Ries & Squier, 1996). Additionally,​ the emphasis on an individualized rehabilitation plans leads to successful outcomes because patients are able to focus on the areas that they need to develop the most (Ries & Squier, 1996). Finally, by focusing on both the physical and social function of these individuals,​ pulmonary rehabilitation allows patients to work on emotional issues. This aspect has been correlated with better outcomes in physical symptoms, such as lung function and exercise tolerance (Ries & Squier, 1996). ​ Across North America, pulmonary rehabilitation has become an extremely popular method for long-term management of COPD (Goldstein et al., 1994). It aims to manage and improve some of the disabilities that are associated with COPD, such as decreased motor function and weight loss (Goldstein et al., 1994). There are three facets of pulmonary rehabilitation are: the multidisciplinary nature of, individualized programs and attention to physical and social function (Ries & Squier, 1996). The collaboration between various kinds health care professionals makes pulmonary rehabilitation very successful because it encompasses a variety of health care fields. Individuals involved include: physicians, nurses, occupational therapists, psychologists,​ nutritionists and exercise specialists. (Ries & Squier, 1996). Additionally,​ the emphasis on an individualized rehabilitation plans leads to successful outcomes because patients are able to focus on the areas that they need to develop the most (Ries & Squier, 1996). Finally, by focusing on both the physical and social function of these individuals,​ pulmonary rehabilitation allows patients to work on emotional issues. This aspect has been correlated with better outcomes in physical symptoms, such as lung function and exercise tolerance (Ries & Squier, 1996). ​
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​nutrition.png|}}</​box| ​Image retrieved from: Retrieved from: http://​blog.copdstore.com/​the-official-guide-to-copd-nutrition>​+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​nutrition.png|}}</​box| ​Figure 7Foods Full of Nutrition. ​Retrieved from: http://​blog.copdstore.com/​the-official-guide-to-copd-nutrition>​
  
  
Line 124: Line 120:
  
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​pulmonary_rehabilitation_in_action.png|}}</​box| ​Image retrieved ​from: http://​drvijaynair.8m.com/​ >+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​pulmonary_rehabilitation_in_action.png|}}</​box| ​Figure 8: Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Action. Retrieved ​from: http://​drvijaynair.8m.com/​ >
  
  
Line 132: Line 128:
  
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​significant_improvement_in_exercise_improvement.png|}}</​box| Figure : Significant improvement in exercise endurance, for up to 3 months, in individuals who participated in 6 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation. Modified from: Berry et al. (1999)>+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​significant_improvement_in_exercise_improvement.png|}}</​box| Figure ​9: Significant improvement in exercise endurance, for up to 3 months, in individuals who participated in 6 weeks of pulmonary rehabilitation. Modified from: Berry et al. (1999)>
  
  
 Furthermore,​ a study done by Lacasse et al. (2006), showed significant improvements with the participation in pulmonary rehabilitation in other symptoms common to COPD patients as well. It was proven that pulmonary rehabilitation relieved symptoms of dyspnea (labored breathing) and fatigue, which is common found in COPD patients due to the muscle loss and increased energy expenditure of movement (Lacasse et al. 2006). Additionally,​ improvements to the emotional state of COPD patients were shown to enhance an individual’s sense of mastery and control over their condition (Lacasee et al., 2006). Results of this study are shown below. After much research, the significant yield of results illustrate why pulmonary rehabilitation is a crucial component in the long-term management of COPD.  Furthermore,​ a study done by Lacasse et al. (2006), showed significant improvements with the participation in pulmonary rehabilitation in other symptoms common to COPD patients as well. It was proven that pulmonary rehabilitation relieved symptoms of dyspnea (labored breathing) and fatigue, which is common found in COPD patients due to the muscle loss and increased energy expenditure of movement (Lacasse et al. 2006). Additionally,​ improvements to the emotional state of COPD patients were shown to enhance an individual’s sense of mastery and control over their condition (Lacasee et al., 2006). Results of this study are shown below. After much research, the significant yield of results illustrate why pulmonary rehabilitation is a crucial component in the long-term management of COPD. 
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​improvement_of_symptoms.png|}}</​box| Figure : Illustration of the improvement of symptoms, which are common in COPD patients, with the participation in pulmonary rehabilitation. Modified from: Lacasse et al. (2006)>+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​improvement_of_symptoms.png|}}</​box| Figure ​10: Illustration of the improvement of symptoms, which are common in COPD patients, with the participation in pulmonary rehabilitation. Modified from: Lacasse et al. (2006)>
  
  
Line 154: Line 150:
 Stopping smoking is one of the main treatments for patients with COPD to effectively slow down disease progression (Willemse, 2005). The most evident clinical characteristics in COPD is respiratory symptoms and the accelerated decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). By not smoking there will be an improvement to respiratory symptoms, which may be because of the decrease of goblet cells. It will also stabilize the accelerated decline in FEV1, strongly indicating that stopping smoking will positively influence inflammatory and remodelling processes in the lungs. ​ It was seen that during the first year after stopping smoking, FEV1 improved by 57 mL in quitters, but fell by 32 mL in patients that continued to smoke. An improvement of inflammation is also seen, resulting from a combination of increased anti-inflammatory receptor levels and reduced neutrophil chemoattractants (Willemse, 2004). Stopping smoking is one of the main treatments for patients with COPD to effectively slow down disease progression (Willemse, 2005). The most evident clinical characteristics in COPD is respiratory symptoms and the accelerated decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). By not smoking there will be an improvement to respiratory symptoms, which may be because of the decrease of goblet cells. It will also stabilize the accelerated decline in FEV1, strongly indicating that stopping smoking will positively influence inflammatory and remodelling processes in the lungs. ​ It was seen that during the first year after stopping smoking, FEV1 improved by 57 mL in quitters, but fell by 32 mL in patients that continued to smoke. An improvement of inflammation is also seen, resulting from a combination of increased anti-inflammatory receptor levels and reduced neutrophil chemoattractants (Willemse, 2004).
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​effect_of_smoking_cessation_on_postbronchodilator_forced_expiratory_volume_in_one_second_fev1_decline._willemse_2004_.jpeg|}}</​box| Figure 12: Effect of Smoking Cessation on Postbronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Decline. ​(Willemse2004).>+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​effect_of_smoking_cessation_on_postbronchodilator_forced_expiratory_volume_in_one_second_fev1_decline._willemse_2004_.jpeg|}}</​box| Figure 12: Effect of Smoking Cessation on Postbronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Decline. ​Modified from: Willemse ​(2004)>
  
-==== Medical Treatment ====+===== Medical Treatment ​=====
  
 **Bronchodilators** **Bronchodilators**
Line 162: Line 158:
 Bronchodilators are a class of medications that are widely used to treat COPD and aid in preventing airflow obstruction in COPD patients (Shim, 1989). These drugs provide relief of some symptoms commonly associated with COPD, such as dyspnea or decreased exercise tolerance, through the relaxation of smooth muscle that line airways (Barnes, 1995). Due to the increase build-up of smooth muscle in COPD patients and subsequent impairment of lung function, these bronchodilators are extremely important in the prevention/​reduction of airway obstruction (Berge et al., 2011). The two main bronchodilators used in the treatment of COPD are beta-agonist’s and anti-cholinergic’s (Barnes, 1995). Beta-agonist’s are the most widely used bronchodilator typically used to treat COPD patients (Barnes, 1995). Beta-agonist’s act by binding to the adrenergic receptors on smooth muscle cells and cause an increase of cyclic-AMP (cAMP), a secondary messenger, within the smooth muscle cell. The increase in cAMP causes an intra-cellular cascade that ultimately leads to a relaxation of the smooth muscle surrounding the airway and thus causing bronchodilation (Tashkin & Fabbri, 2010). Long-acting beta-agonist’s in specific, such as formoterol or salmeterol, have been proven to more effectively than regular beta-agonist medications,​ primarily due to their rapid onset and long duration of action (Barnes, 1995). ​ Bronchodilators are a class of medications that are widely used to treat COPD and aid in preventing airflow obstruction in COPD patients (Shim, 1989). These drugs provide relief of some symptoms commonly associated with COPD, such as dyspnea or decreased exercise tolerance, through the relaxation of smooth muscle that line airways (Barnes, 1995). Due to the increase build-up of smooth muscle in COPD patients and subsequent impairment of lung function, these bronchodilators are extremely important in the prevention/​reduction of airway obstruction (Berge et al., 2011). The two main bronchodilators used in the treatment of COPD are beta-agonist’s and anti-cholinergic’s (Barnes, 1995). Beta-agonist’s are the most widely used bronchodilator typically used to treat COPD patients (Barnes, 1995). Beta-agonist’s act by binding to the adrenergic receptors on smooth muscle cells and cause an increase of cyclic-AMP (cAMP), a secondary messenger, within the smooth muscle cell. The increase in cAMP causes an intra-cellular cascade that ultimately leads to a relaxation of the smooth muscle surrounding the airway and thus causing bronchodilation (Tashkin & Fabbri, 2010). Long-acting beta-agonist’s in specific, such as formoterol or salmeterol, have been proven to more effectively than regular beta-agonist medications,​ primarily due to their rapid onset and long duration of action (Barnes, 1995). ​
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​action_of_beta-agonists.png|}}</​box| Figure : Mechanism of Action of Beta-Agonists>​+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​action_of_beta-agonists.png|}}</​box| Figure ​13: Mechanism of Action of Beta-Agonists>​
  
 The other kind of bronchodilator used are anti-cholinergic’s,​ also known as muscarinic antagonists. These not used as often as beta-agonist’s but have been shown to aid in improvement of airway flow in COPD patients as well (Barnes, 1995). Anti-cholinergic’s act by blocking the binding of acetylcholine,​ which is released from the pre-synaptic cleft of a neuron, to the smooth muscle acetylcholine receptor. By blocking the binding, anti-cholinergic’s are able to prevent bronchoconstriction (Tashkin & Fabbri, 2010).  ​ The other kind of bronchodilator used are anti-cholinergic’s,​ also known as muscarinic antagonists. These not used as often as beta-agonist’s but have been shown to aid in improvement of airway flow in COPD patients as well (Barnes, 1995). Anti-cholinergic’s act by blocking the binding of acetylcholine,​ which is released from the pre-synaptic cleft of a neuron, to the smooth muscle acetylcholine receptor. By blocking the binding, anti-cholinergic’s are able to prevent bronchoconstriction (Tashkin & Fabbri, 2010).  ​
  
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​action_of_anti-cholinergics.png|}}</​box| Figure : Action of Anti-Cholinergics>​+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​action_of_anti-cholinergics.png|}}</​box| Figure ​14: Action of Anti-Cholinergics>​
  
  
-==== Efficacy of Bronchodilators ​====+**Efficacy of Bronchodilators**
  
 Studies have shown the long-acting beta-agonist’s (LABAs), such as formoterol, are the best course of medical treatments for individuals with COPD (Rossi, Khirani & Cazzola, 2008). These LABAs are more effective due to their rapid onset and prolonged duration (Barnes, 1995). When used, COPD patients saw improvement with common symptoms, such as dyspnea and decreased exercise tolerance, within minutes-hours after ingestion. Additionally,​ these drugs also helped improved lung function, reduce exacerbations and overall improve the health status of symptomatic patients with moderate-severe COPD (Rossi, Khirani & Cazzola, 2008). In a clinical study done by Van Noord et al. (2005), results showed that the efficacy of LABAs improved with the combined use of anti-cholinergic drugs. These results were only found in patients with severe COPD and only for the first 12-24 hours after ingestion (Van Noord et al., 2005). ​ Studies have shown the long-acting beta-agonist’s (LABAs), such as formoterol, are the best course of medical treatments for individuals with COPD (Rossi, Khirani & Cazzola, 2008). These LABAs are more effective due to their rapid onset and prolonged duration (Barnes, 1995). When used, COPD patients saw improvement with common symptoms, such as dyspnea and decreased exercise tolerance, within minutes-hours after ingestion. Additionally,​ these drugs also helped improved lung function, reduce exacerbations and overall improve the health status of symptomatic patients with moderate-severe COPD (Rossi, Khirani & Cazzola, 2008). In a clinical study done by Van Noord et al. (2005), results showed that the efficacy of LABAs improved with the combined use of anti-cholinergic drugs. These results were only found in patients with severe COPD and only for the first 12-24 hours after ingestion (Van Noord et al., 2005). ​
  
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​untitled4.png|}}</​box| Figure : Improvement of lung capacity, within the first 12-24 hours, in individuals with severe COPD after the ingestion of both long-acting beta-agonist’s and anticholingeric medications. Modified from: Van Noord et al. (2005)+<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​improvement_of_lung_capacity.png|}}</​box| Figure ​15: Improvement of lung capacity, within the first 12-24 hours, in individuals with severe COPD after the ingestion of both long-acting beta-agonist’s and anticholingeric medications. Modified from: Van Noord et al. (2005)>
  
- 
-**Which is Better?** 
- 
- 
-There are several different ways in which GM crops can impact non-target insects. A prevalent example in the public has been the monarch butterfly and is considered a species of conservational value. In a lab study, Monarch larvae on milkweed leaves were dusted with Bt maize pollen and left to grow. It was found that the larvae with BT pollen ate less, grew slower and experienced higher mortality compared to the larvae cultivated with non-GM pollen. It is still difficult to measure the effect of Bt pollen on monarchs in the wild due to many natural factors, including; the required dosage of pollen, the likelihood of exposure to pollen, and the effect of degradation of Bt from rain (37).  
- 
-<box width classes round white centre|>​{{:​monarch_butterfly_on_milkweed.jpg|}}</​box| Figure 13: Monarch Butterfly on Milkweed. 
-Retrieved from: http://​www.bigblogofgardening.com/​home-gardeners-can-save-the-monarch-butterfly-with-milkweed/>​ 
  
 ===== Conclusion ===== ===== Conclusion =====
  
- +Overall, COPD is becoming an increasingly prevalent cause of death worldwide. The disease is thought ​to be caused by a variety of genetic factors, which can be triggered ​or exacerbated by environmental factorssuch as smoking or air pollutionUnless caused by an alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, there is no cure for COPD but only management options for helping individuals struggling with this diseasePulmonary rehabilitation,​ which includes exercisenutritional ​and psychosocial support, combined with bronchodilator medication ​have been proven ​to improve common symptoms of COPD and improve long-term outcomes of COPD patients 
- +
-  +
- ​**Controversies** +
- +
-Controversy ​is mainly surrounding health and environmental risk factors ​of GMOsThis includes factors that are known and unknown due to lack of research. Rumours and stigmas about GMOs that are portrayed by the media are often results from scientific papers that have been exaggerated. +
-The USA does not currently have labelling laws for GM food (25). It remains ​to be decided if labelling GM products is good or bad. On one handlabelling something ​as GMO makes the consumer more aware but means that less will buy the product (as mentioned in Public Opinions)This results in increased food market prices and resource strain as companies attempt to satisfy the demand ​for non-GMOs. +
-By 2050 the UN predicts that humans will need to produce 70% more food than we currently do now in 2016 (19). This increase in food production alone will strain resources, and GMOs have the potential ​to help by providing food with more nutrients, the ability to grow in harsh climates ​and many other altercations that could be a solution to our growing population’s food demands. +
-The question remains, is a world without GMOs sustainable?​+
    
  
 ===== References ===== ===== References =====
 +1. Barnes, P. J. (1995). Bronchodilators:​ basic pharmacology. In Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (pp. 391-417). Springer US.
  
 +2. Bauer, J., Biolo, G., Cederholm, T., Cesari, M., Cruz-Jentoft,​ A. J., Morley, J. E., ... & Visvanathan,​ R. (2013). Evidence-based recommendations for optimal dietary protein intake in older people: a position paper from the PROT-AGE Study Group. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association,​ 14(8), 542-559.
  
-1Aktar, M. W., SenguptaD., & ChowdhuryA. (2009). Impact of pesticides use in agriculture:​ their benefits ​and hazardsInterdisciplinary Toxicology2(1), 1–12http://doi.org/10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7+3Berge, M. V., HackenN. H., Cohen, J., Douma, W. R., & PostmaD. S. (2011). Small Airway Disease ​in Asthma ​and COPDChest139(2), 412-423. doi:10.1378/chest.10-1210
  
-2Aris A., Leblanc S. (2011May). Maternal and fetal exposure to pesticides associated to genetically modified foods in Eastern Townships of QuebecCanadaReproductive Toxicology 31(4): 528-33. Doi:10.1016/j.reprotox+4Bourdin, ​A., Burgel, P., Chanez, P., Garcia, G., Perez, T., & Roche, N. (2009September 5). Recent advances ​in COPD: Pathophysiologyrespiratory physiology and clinical aspects, including comorbiditiesEuropean Respiratory Review, 18(114), 198-212. Doi: 10.1183/09059180.00005509.
  
-3BaumanD(1999February 5). Bovine somatotropin ​and lactation: From basic science to commercial applicationDomestic Animal Endocrinology17(2-3), 101-116doi:​10.1016/​s0739-7240(99)00028-4+5BrugJ., Schols, A., & Mesters, I. (2004). Dietary change, nutrition education ​and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasePatient education and counseling52(3), 249-257.
  
-4Benfey, T. (2014). Opinion: Sizing up GM Salmon; On the Potential Benefits and Risks of Genetically Modified Fish Entering the Marketplace. The Scientist. Retrieved 23 September from http://www.the-scientist.com/?​articles.view/​articleNo/​40086/​title/​Opinion--Sizing-Up-GM-Salmon/​+6Cambach, W., Wagenaar, R. C., Koelman, T. W., van Keimpema, T., & Kemper, H. C. (1999). The long-term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseasea research synthesisArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation,​ 80(1), 103-111.
  
-5BoyleR. (2011). How to Genetically Modify ​Seed, Step by StepPopular ScienceRetrieved from http://www.popsci.com/​science/​article/​2011-01/life-cycle-genetically-modified-seed ​+7CastaldiP., et al. (2010). The COPD genetic association compendium: ​comprehensive online database of COPD genetic associationsHuman Molecular Genetis19 (3), 526-534. Doi:10.1093/hmg/ddp519 
 +  
 +8Chung, KF. (2005, June 22). The Role of Airway Smooth Muscle in the Pathogenesis of Airway Wall Remodeling in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Proceedings of the American Thoracic Society, 2(4), 347-354. doi:10.1513/pats.200504-028sr.
  
-6CannellR.Q & HawesJ.D. (1994). Soil Till Res30245.+9DeMeoD., et al(2009)Integration of genomic and genetic approaches implicates IREB2 as a COPD susceptibility gene. American journal of human genetics. 85 (4), 493-502. Doi:​10.1016/​j.ajhg.2009.09.004
  
-7Engelhard, M., HagenK., & ThieleF. (2007, November). Pharming A New Branch ​of BiotechnologyEuropäische Akademie437-12.+10Goldstein, R. S., Gort, E. H., Avendano, M. A., StubbingD., & GuyattG. H. (1994). Randomised controlled trial of respiratory rehabilitationThe Lancet,344(8934)1394-1397.
  
-8Institute ​for Green Energy and Clean Environment. (2009). Phytoremediation and Phytosensing TechnologiesRetrieved fromhttp://systemsbiology.usm.edu/BrachyWRKY/WRKY/​Phytoremediation.html+11. Hancock, D., et al. (2010). Meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies identify multiple loci associated with pulmonary function. Nature genetics. 42 (1), 45-52. Doi:​10.1038/​ng.500 
 +  
 +12. Hautamaki, R., et al. (1997)Requirement ​for macrophage elastase for cigarette smoke-induced emphysema in miceScience ​(New York, N.Y.). 277 (5334), 2002-4Doi:10.1126/science.277.5334.2002 
 +  
 +13. Joos, J., Pare, P., Sandford, A. (2002). Genetic risk factors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Wolters Kluwer Health. 8 (2), 87-97. Doi: 2002/03/smw-09752
  
-9InuiH. & OhkawaH. (2005). Herbicide resistance in transgenic plants with mammalian P450 monooxygenases genesPest Management Science61:286-291.+14KoF. & HuiD. (2012). Air pollution and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespirology17 (3), 395-401. Doi10.1111/​j.1440-1843.2011.02112.x
  
-10IsmaelY., Bennett, R., MorseS. (2002). Agricultural Biology Forum5 (4).+15MacNeeW(2006May 20)ABC of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Pathologypathogenesisand pathophysiologyBmj, 332(7551), 1202-1204doi:10.1136/​bmj.332.7551.1202.
  
-11JaenischRMintzB. (1974). Simian Virus 40 DNA Sequences ​in DNA of Healthy Adult Mice Derived from Preimplantation Blastocysts Injected with Viral DNANCBI, 71(4). Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/​pmc/​articles/​PMC388203+16MathesonM., et al. (2005). Biological dust exposure ​in the workplace is a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseThorax. 60 (8), 645-51Doi10.1136/thx.2004.035170
  
-12James, C. (2002). Global review ​of commercialized transgenic crops(Feature: Bt Cotton), International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications2612+17Paknikar S. (2013). Increased Airway Resistance in COPD Occurs Due to Loss or Narrowing ​of Small Airways. http://www.medindia.net/​news/​healthinfocus/​increased-airway-resistance-in-copd-occurs-due-to-loss-or-narrowing-of-small-airways-92858-1.htm
  
-13JohnsonB. (2003). Problems ​of plant conservation in agricultural landscapes: can biotechnology help or hinder? Methods for Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants. (109-120). PeterboroughUKEnglish Nature+18PendasA., et al. (1996). Fine physical mapping ​of the human matrix metalloproteinase genes clustered on chromosome 11q22.3. Genomics. 37 (2), 266-8. Doi10.1006/​geno.1996.0557
  
-14KindA., & Schnieke, A. (2008, July 29). Animal pharming, ​two decades onTransgenic Res Transgenic Research, 17(6), 1025-1033doi:10.1007/s11248-008-9206-3+19PillaiS., et al. (2009). A genome-wide association study in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): identification of two major susceptibility lociPLoS genetics. 5 (3). Doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000421
  
-15KoleR.K., Banerjee, H., Bhattacharyya,​ A. (2001). Monitoring of market fish samples for endosulfan and hexachlorocyclohexane residues ​in and around Calcutta. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 67(4). 554-9.+20RiesAL., & Squier, H. C. (1996). The team concept ​in pulmonary rehabilitation. Lung Biology in Health ​and Disease, 91, 55-66.
  
-16Kues, W. (2004)The contribution of farm animals to human healthTrends in Biotechnology22(6)286-294doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.04.003+21RiesA. L., Bauldoff, G. S., Carlin, B. W., Casaburi, R., Emery, C. F., MahlerDA.... & Herrerias, C. (2007). Pulmonary rehabilitation:​ joint ACCP/AACVPR evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. CHEST Journal,​131(5_suppl),​ 4S-42S
  
-17LangerG. (2016). Skepticism of Genetically Modified Foods. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abcnews.go.com/​Technology/​story?​id=97567&​page=1+22RossiA., Khirani, S., & Cazzola, M. (2008). Long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseefficacy and safetyInternational Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 3(4), 521–529.
  
-18MaksimenkoOG., DeykinAV., KhodarovichY. M., & GeorgievPG. (2013). Use of Transgenic Animals ​in Biotechnology:​ Prospect ​and ProblemsActa Naturae5(16), 1st ser., 33-46.+23ScholsAM., SlangenJ. OS., VolovicsL., & WoutersEF. (1998). Weight loss is a reversible factor ​in the prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. American journal of respiratory ​and critical care medicine, 157(6), 1791-1797. 
 +  
 +24. ShimC. (1989). Response to bronchodilators. Clinics in chest medicine10(2), 155-164. 
 +  
 +25. SmithC. & Harrison, D. (1997). Association between polymorphism in gene for microsomal epoxide hydrolase and susceptibility to emphysema. The Lancet. 350 (9078), 630-633Doi: 10.1016/​S0140-6736(96)08061-0
  
-19. Northoff, E. (2016). 2050 A third more mouths to feed. Food and Agriculture Organization ​of the United NationsRetrieved from http://www.fao.org/news/story/​en/​item/​35571/​icode/+26Takeda ​(2012). Pathophysiology ​of COPD. http://www.thinkcopdifferently.com/About%20COPD/What%20is%20COPD/Pathophysiology%20of%20COPD.aspx 
 +  
 +27. Tashkin, D. P., & Fabbri, L. M. (2010). Long-acting beta-agonists in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current and future agents. Respiratory research, 11(1), 1.
  
-20. Oerke, E.C., Dehen, H.W., Schonbeck F. & Weber, A. (1994). Crop Production and Crop Protection: Estimated Losses in Major Food and Cash Crops. Elsevier.  +28Tests for COPD. (n.d.). NHS. Retrieved from http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease/Pages/​Diagnosis.aspx 
- +  
-21. P. A., & J. R. (2001, September)Recombinant proteins ​for neurodegenerative diseases: The delivery issueTrends in Neurosciences,​ 24(9). +29Van Noord, J. A., AumannJL., JanssensE., SmeetsJJ., VerhaertJ., DisseB., ... & Cornelissen, P. J. G. (2005). ​Comparison of tiotropium once daily, formoterol twice daily and both combined once daily in patients with COPDEuropean Respiratory Journal26(2), 214-222
- +  
-22Powell, C. (2015). How to Make a GMO. Science in the News, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://sitn.hms.harvard.edu/flash/2015/how-to-make-a-gmo+30WillemseBWM., Ten Hacken, ​N. HT., RutgersB., Lesman-LeegteIGAT., Postma, D. S., & TimensW. (2005). Effect ​of 1-year smoking cessation on airway inflammation in COPD and asymptomatic smokersEuropean Respiratory Journal26(5), 835-845.
- +
-23Pretty, J. (2001)The rapid emergence of genetic modification in world agriculture:​ Contested risks and benefits. Environmental Conservation28(3)248-262doi:10.1017/​S0376892901000261 +
- +
-24. QaimM.& Zilberman, D(2003). Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science299(5608)900-902. +
- +
-25RangelG. (2015). Form Corgis to Corn. Science in the NewsHarvard UniversityRetrieved from http://​sitn.hms.harvard.edu/​flash/​2015/​from-corgis-to-corn-a-brief-look-at-the-long-history-of-gmo-technology/​ +
- +
-26. RT Autonomous Nonprofit Organization “TV-Novosti” (2013November 26) GMOs linked to gluten disorders plaguing 18 million Americans . https://​www.rt.com/​usa/​gmo-gluten-sensitivity-trigger-343 +
- +
-27. SaltD.E., Smith, R.D., Raskin, I(1998). Phytoremediation. Annual Rev Plant Physiology Plant Mol Biol. 49: 643-668. +
- +
-28. Snow, A. A., Andow, D. A., Gepts, P., Hallerman, E. M., Power, A., Tiedje, ​J. M., & Wolfenbarger,​ L. L. (2005). ​Genetically engineered organisms ​and the environment:​ current status and recommendationsEcological Applications,15(2), 377-404+
- +
-29SpäthA(2013)Unleashing the Frankenfish. News24. Retrieved 23 September from http://​www.news24.com/​Columnists/​AndreasSpath/​Unleashing-the-Frankenfish-20130603 +
- +
-30. Spisak S., Solymosi ​N., Ittzes P., Bodor A., Kondor D.Vattay G., et al. (2013July 30)Complete Genes May Pass from Food to Human BloodPLoS ONE 8(7): e69805Doi: 10.1371/​journal.pone.0069805 +
- +
-31Suzuki, D. (2014)Understanding GMO. The David Suzuki Foundation. Retrieved from http://​www.davidsuzuki.org/​what-you-can-do/​queen-of-green/​faqs/​food/​understanding-gmo/​ +
- +
-32. TuszynskiM. H. (2002May)Growth-factor gene therapy for neurodegenerative disorders. The Lancet Neurology, 1(1), 51-57doi:​10.1016/​s1474-4422(02)00006-6 +
- +
-33. United States Department ​of Agriculture (2000). Genetically engineered crops: has the adoption reduced pesticide use? Retrieved from: www.ers.usda.gov/​epubs/​pdf/​agout/​aug2000/​ao273f.pdf +
- +
-34. United States Department of Agriculture (2014). Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops by US Farmers has Increased Steadily for Over 15 years. Retrieved from: http://​www.ers.usda.gov/​amber-waves/​2014-march/​adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-by-us-farmers-has-increased-steadily-for-over-15-years.aspx#​.V-wfE5MrKt9. +
- +
-35. U.S. Geological Survey. (1999). The quality of our nation'​s waters – nutrients ​and pesticidesRetreieved from:​http://​water.usgs.gov/​pubs/​circ/​circ1225/​ +
- +
-36. World Health Organization (WHO). (2013, November). Evaluation of certain veterinary drug residues in food. Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, (78), 988th ser. doi:​10.1002/​food.19880320917+
  
-37WolfenbargerLL., & PhiferPR. (2000). The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plantsScience290(5499), 2088-2093.+31WillemseBW. M., Ten Hacken, N. H. T., Rutgers, B., Lesman-Leegte,​ I. G. A. T., Timens, W., & PostmaDS. (2004). Smoking cessation improves both direct ​and indirect airway hyperresponsiveness in COPDEuropean respiratory journal24(3), 391-396.
Print/export
QR Code
QR Code group_4_presentation_2_-_chronic_obstructive_pulmonary_disease_copd (generated for current page)